In 1977 the poet and educator, Adrienne Rich gave a convocation speech at Douglass College in which she reminded her audience:
If university education means anything beyond the processing of human beings into expected roles, through credit hours, tests, and grades (and I believe that in a women’s college especially it might mean much more), it implies an ethical and intellectual contract between teacher and student. This contract must remain intuitive, dynamic, unwritten; but we must turn to it again and again if learning is to be reclaimed from the depersonalizing and cheapening
pressures of the present-day academic scene (‘Claiming an Education’).
This year in the reading group we are taking our cue from Rich’s still resonant words to think about what generative AI means for critical pedagogy in 2025. All of us, students and teachers alike, are still trying to get to grips with how technology has or has not changed the meaning of a ‘basic’ skill in university education. Do we need to learn to do things without AI to ensure we understand and think for ourselves? Or, should we be integrating automated processes and automating tools into our work to create time to focus even more on ‘higher’ level skills, such as critical judgment and analysis? Technology optimists regularly promise us that automating basic processes leaves us free to focus on critical ones, but we all also know that we use our smartphones to scroll Insta or go shopping at any time of the day or night, rather than using our freed up time to read more books or actively reflect on the world we want to build. What does it mean to claim an education in 2025 when there are so many attempts to automate, depersonalize, and commodify teaching and learning?

If you would like to take part in this year’s discussions or just stay informed about the Reading Group meetings and our other events please do subscribe to our mailing list at: https://www.jiscmail.ac.uk/cgi-bin/webadmin?SUBED1=CPG&A=1